Case 3310935/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sonia Di Girolamo v The LK Partnership LLP Heard: via CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 3310935/2020
- Decision date
- 23 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tuck QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sonia Di Girolamo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Sonia Di Girolamo was employed by The LK Partnership LLP as an accounts assistant from 6 August 2019 until she resigned with effect from 11 December 2020. She was paid monthly in arrears, with a contractual annual salary of £18,100 and a net monthly pay of around £1,320. The ET1 presented on 20 August 2020 originally complained about missing payslips for October 2019 to March 2020. At the hearing on 15 February 2021, the respondent did not appear. The tribunal allowed the claimant to amend the claim to include the later period and an unlawful deduction from wages complaint, finding the amendment closely connected to the pleaded issues and in the interests of justice.
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide pay statements as required by section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for the period October 2019 until 11 December 2020, except for payslips issued in April, May, June and July 2020. It accepted the claimant's evidence that she had the payslips she did receive and bank statements showing the later payments.
On the deduction claim, the tribunal found that from August 2020 to November 2020 the claimant received net payments of £1,280 rather than the expected net sum of about £1,320, and that she had not consented in writing to any deduction. She was told the difference related in some way to her pension, but she did not know the basis or amount of the payments. For December 2020, the tribunal noted that no payslip had been received and that a payment of £1,094.01 was made in late January 2021; on a broad-brush approach it assumed a further £20 deduction for that month. It therefore found unlawful deductions of £40 per month for four months plus £20 for December, and ordered the respondent to pay £180 net to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim concerned the respondent's failure to provide pay statements required by section 8 ERA 1996 for the period October 2019 until 11 December 2020, save for payslips issued in April, May, June and July 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions of £40 per month for August to November 2020, plus an assumed £20 deduction for December 2020, giving a net award of £180. | Upheld | — | £180 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £180
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 8 ERA 1996
- section 13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.