Case 3310941/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Caulton, Father For the v M & N Global Enterprises T/a Just For Cuts — 2021
- Case reference
- 3310941/2020
- Decision date
- 7 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Caulton, Father For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Miss Heidi Green was made redundant by M & N Global Enterprises t/a Just For Cuts in June 2020. It held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment and ordered payment of £1,135.35.
The tribunal also found that the respondents were in breach of contract in failing to pay notice pay, and ordered damages of £1,059.66. In addition, it found that during the furlough period from March 2020 to June 2020 the claimant had accrued holiday pay on a pro-rata basis, and ordered payment of £209.04.
The total award payable by the respondents was £2,404.05. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was made redundant by the respondents in June 2020 and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,135 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondents were in breach of contract by failing to pay notice pay and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £1,060 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that during furlough from March 2020 to June 2020 the claimant was entitled to accrued holiday pay pro rata. | Upheld | — | £209 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,404
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.