Case 3310945/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Kaye v Triple Home Care Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310945/2022
- Decision date
- 20 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Members
- Venue
- Norwich
- Panel members
- Ms H Gunnel, Mr J Williams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Kaye
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Norwich, sitting by CVP on 1, 2 and 3 May 2024, found that Miss T Kaye’s claim of unfair dismissal against Triple Home Care Limited succeeded. It also found that her claim that she was discriminated against by reason of perceived disability failed and was dismissed.
The written record does not set out the tribunal’s reasons, because it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. On the face of the judgment, the tribunal made only the liability findings and did not include a substantive explanation of the evidence or legal reasoning in the written decision.
The issue of remedy was not determined in this judgment. The tribunal directed that remedy would be decided at a separate hearing by CVP with a one-day time estimate, listed to commence on 2 October 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim was brought by reason of perceived disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.