Case 3310946/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Drury v Ipswich Burger Trading Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3310946/2022
- Decision date
- 24 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Drury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 24 August 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge dealt with the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal determined the claim without a hearing on the respondent's response.
The tribunal found that Ipswich Burger Trading Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr H Drury's wages. The judgment records that the respondent must pay the claimant £1,300 net. No other head of claim, remedy breakdown, or legal issue is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not present a valid response on time. Under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the Employment Judge determined the claim on the papers and found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £1,300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,300
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.