Case 3310962/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss May, Solicitor For the v Mr Brewer, Sole Trader — 2020
- Case reference
- 3310962/2020
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss May, Solicitor For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Barber was found to have been an employee of Mr Brewer t/a Brewer and Jackson Homes from 2003 to June 2020. The tribunal relied on the regular weekly payments, personal service, Mr Brewer's control over the work, the absence of any substitution right, and the history of holiday pay and sickness-related payments.
The tribunal found that the employment ended by redundancy at the end of June 2020 because the requirement for the claimant's work had ceased or diminished. It accepted that Mr Brewer had no work available and applied a Polkey assessment, finding that even if a fair redundancy procedure had been followed there was a 100% chance the claimant would still have been dismissed. It also recorded a complete lack of procedure and a failure to follow the Acas Code.
The tribunal awarded £12,093.30 as a redundancy payment and a further £3,023.32 uplift, together with £5,374.80 for breach of contract in lieu of 12 weeks' notice, £797.62 for accrued holiday pay, £3,975.90 for unlawful deduction of wages, and £450 for loss of statutory rights. The total award was £25,714.94 and was not subject to recoupment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found a dismissal at the end of June 2020, identified redundancy as the fair reason, recorded a complete lack of procedure, and found a 100% chance the claimant would have been dismissed in any event on a Polkey assessment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment of £12,093.30 plus a £3,023.32 uplift (25%) for failure to follow the Acas Code. | Upheld | — | £15,117 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for 12 weeks' notice. | Upheld | — | £5,375 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued 12.5 days' holiday at termination. | Upheld | — | £798 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Wages shortfall during lockdown after crediting £951.00 already paid. | Upheld | — | £3,976 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,715
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.230 ERA 1996
- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.139 ERA 1996
- Polkey consideration
- Acas Code of Conduct uplift
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.