Case 3310991/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Emamally First v Alexander Mann Solutions Limited Second Respondent: M & G Corporate Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3310991/2022
- Decision date
- 2 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Cowen Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Emamally First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford Employment Tribunal on 6 December 2023, Employment Judge L Cowen issued a reserved judgment dealing only with case management and withdrawal points. The judge held that the claimant's allegations or arguments that there was any contravention of the Equality Act 2010 based on the factual assertion at paragraph 2.2.1 of the List of Issues had no reasonable prospect of success, and struck out that part of the claim only.
The judgment also records that the claimant's breach of contract claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive merits findings, liability findings, or monetary remedy were set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The Employment Judge held that the claimant's allegations or arguments that there was any contravention of the Equality Act 2010 based on the factual assertion at paragraph 2.2.1 of the List of Issues had no reasonable prospect of success, and that part of the claim only was struck out. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's breach of contract claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.