Case 3311002/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Thorpe v JD Fitness Group — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311002/2023
- Decision date
- 27 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Thorpe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 19 September 2023 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Anstis decided that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,903.88. It also ordered the respondent to pay £322.67 as compensation for breach of contract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £3,904 |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment following the respondent's failure to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £323 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,227
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.