Case 3311003/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sandy Da Costa Dinis v Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311003/2020
- Decision date
- 30 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Members
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms J Stewart, Ms B Osborne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sandy Da Costa Dinis
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Miss Sandy Da Costa Dinis's claims against Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health UK Limited over five hearing days in January 2023. The written judgment records that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and detriment because of making a protected disclosure were not well founded.
Both complaints were dismissed. The extracted judgment does not include the tribunal's detailed factual findings or reasoning, and it records that oral reasons were given at the hearing. No written reasons are included in the record provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to this as a detriment complaint because of making a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.