Case 3311044/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Lean on Me Community Care Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311044/2020
- Decision date
- 6 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant started work for the respondent on 10 January 2020 assisting with office administration and was not given a written statement of terms and conditions. The tribunal accepted the payslips for January and February 2020 as genuine and found that the parties had agreed a 25-hour working week. It did not accept the claimant’s case that he had been dismissed at the meeting on 13 March 2020.
Instead, the tribunal found that the employment continued after 13 March 2020 and ended on 10 July 2020, after the claimant had been paid furlough monies on 6 July 2020. On that footing, the claimant remained entitled to pay after 13 March 2020. Using the February 2020 payslip as the only full paid month, the tribunal found his net weekly pay was £188.39.
The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim for one week’s notice pay and awarded £188.39. It also upheld the unlawful deductions claim for arrears of pay for May and June 2020, awarding £1,248, and the holiday pay claim, awarding £283.05 for 7.5 days’ accrued but untaken leave. The tribunal found no basis for an uplift on the holiday pay because there was no evidence of a grievance about that issue.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to provide written particulars of employment and, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, awarded two weeks’ net pay of £376.78. The total sum payable under the judgment was £2,096.22.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | One week’s notice pay. The respondent admitted that no notice was given and that the claimant was entitled to notice pay. | Upheld | — | £188 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Net arrears of pay for May and June 2020. The tribunal accepted the February 2020 payslip as genuine and used it to assess weekly and monthly net pay. | Upheld | — | £1,248 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal calculated 7.5 days at £37.74 per day and did not award any uplift because there was no evidence of a grievance about holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £283 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The tribunal awarded two weeks’ net pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £377 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,096
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.