In person For the v Respondent — 2023

Case reference: 3311050/2023
Decision date: 7 November 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Venue: Bury St Edmunds

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a hearing for interim relief only. The tribunal recorded that the application had been presented outside the time limit set out in section 128(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

On that basis, Employment Judge K J Palmer held that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the interim relief application and dismissed it. The judgment also recorded that the claimant's substantive case would be considered later at a telephone preliminary hearing case management discussion.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Application for interim relief was presented outside the time limit in section 128(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear it.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.