Case 3311051/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend, nor represented For the v Mr C Campbell, Director — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311051/2022
- Decision date
- 7 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Members
- Panel members
- Mrs A Brosnan, Ms C Grant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend, nor represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 13 June 2023, the claimant clarified her case as one of direct discrimination because of religion or belief. The matter was then listed for a final hearing on 26 and 27 September 2023 before a full tribunal, with case management orders requiring a joint bundle and witness statements to be exchanged in advance.
The claimant did not attend the final hearing and was not represented. The tribunal clerk tried to contact her by telephone, but the calls went to voicemail and there was no document on the file explaining her absence. The tribunal noted that the claimant had attended the preliminary hearing and had been sent the case management orders, but she had not prepared a witness statement or provided documents for the hearing. Mr Campbell attended for the respondents and applied for dismissal under rule 47 because of the claimant’s absence and failure to comply with the tribunal’s orders.
Having considered the available information, the tribunal concluded that the claimant had failed to progress her case to the final hearing and had not informed the tribunal that she would not be attending. It recorded that, apart from the claim form and WhatsApp messages, there was nothing of much assistance in support of the claim. The tribunal therefore dismissed all claims against the respondents under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | At the preliminary hearing on 13 June 2023, the claimant clarified the claim as direct discrimination because of religion or belief. The tribunal dismissed all claims under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing and had not complied with case management orders. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.