Case 3311055/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Rowe v Yusen Logistics (UK) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311055/2023
- Decision date
- 11 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Rowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and expressly recorded that he was unfairly dismissed. The hearing took place at Watford via video on 22 and 23 July 2024 before Employment Judge Russell.
The written judgment does not set out detailed reasons for the liability finding. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s standard note.
As to remedy, the judgment records that, by consent, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £10,251.64. No breakdown of that sum into basic award, compensatory award, or interest is provided in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The respondent was ordered by consent to pay £10,251.64. | Upheld | — | £10,252 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,252
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.