Case 3311076/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Morris v Amadeus Design and Building Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311076/2022
- Decision date
- 31 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs N Morris was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent, Amadeus Design and Building Limited, to pay damages of £4,000.00. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,713.00.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It did not determine the remedy for the unfair dismissal in this judgment, stating that the remedy would be decided at a Remedy Hearing. This judgment was issued under Rule 21.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,000.00. | Upheld | — | £4,000 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,713.00. | Upheld | — | £1,713 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed, but the remedy was deferred to a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,713
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.