Case 3311077/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Richardson v Brooknight Security Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311077/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Richardson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and accrued holiday pay. It found that those complaints were received outside the requisite time period and that it had been reasonably practicable to present them in time.
The tribunal found that the disability discrimination complaint was also received out of time, but concluded that it was just and equitable to extend time. That claim was not finally determined in this judgment and was ordered to continue, with case management orders set out separately.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed because it was received outside the requisite time period and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have presented it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of accrued holiday pay was dismissed because it was received outside the requisite time period and the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have presented it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the disability discrimination complaint was received out of time but that it was just and equitable to extend time. The judgment states that the claim continues, so no final liability outcome is recorded. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.