Case 3311078/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Nicholls v Apr Logistics — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311078/2022
- Decision date
- 15 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Nicholls
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 29 March 2023 before Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst, the tribunal dealt with the claimant, Mr S Nicholls, and the respondent, APR Logistics Ltd. The judgment records that the hearing took place via CVP and that the respondent was represented by Ms G Scriven, solicitor.
The tribunal struck out the claimant's claim in its entirety because it was presented out of time. On that basis, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim. The judgment does not set out any findings on the merits of the dispute.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, but written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive heads of claim. The claimant's claim was struck out in its entirety because it was presented out of time, and the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.