Case 3311096/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Morahan v And University of Northampton Held by telephone on 9 May 2021 — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311096/2020
- Decision date
- 9 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein Statement
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Morahan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote telephone hearing held on 9 May 2021, Employment Judge Kurrein recorded that the case was heard by telephone because a face-to-face hearing was not practicable and all issues could be determined remotely. The claimant, Ms M Morahan, appeared in person and the respondent, the University of Northampton, was represented by a solicitor.
The only claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not contain findings on the underlying merits of the dismissal claim, because the claim was not determined after a contested hearing.
No remedy was awarded or assessed in the judgment. The written record also states that reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing would not be provided unless requested in time, and none are included in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal; no merits determination was made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.