Case 3311102/2024 · Employment Tribunal
B Wyatt v Accountants etc Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311102/2024
- Decision date
- 9 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
B Wyatt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Employment Tribunal on 9 October 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, and Employment Judge Postle decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s wages claim and found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. It ordered payment of £3,846.16 gross for that claim.
The tribunal also upheld the notice claim, finding that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awarded damages of £2,069.20. A further claim for holiday entitlement was upheld, with £1,570.52 ordered in respect of unpaid holiday entitlement.
The total sum ordered by the tribunal was £7,485.88.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. | Upheld | — | £3,846 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,069 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,571 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,486
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.