Case 3311110/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Tarik Zeremariam v GOPHR Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311110/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Tarik Zeremariam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy judgment under Rule 38 dated 18 July 2024, the tribunal struck out the claims because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's Unless Order dated 2 July 2024. The reasons state that the tribunal ordered the claimant to provide evidence as stipulated in the Unless Order on or before 16 July 2024, and that the claimant had not complied with that order.
The extracted judgment does not contain any substantive findings on liability, remedy, or the merits of the underlying claims. It records only the procedural basis for the strike out, namely non-compliance with the order requiring evidence by the specified deadline.
The judgment was issued by Acting Regional Employment Judge Khalil. No lay members are listed in the extracted text, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claims were struck out under Rule 38 for non-compliance with the Tribunal's Unless Order dated 2 July 2024; the extracted text does not separately identify each head of claim, but the case listing categories include unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claims were struck out under Rule 38 for non-compliance with the Tribunal's Unless Order dated 2 July 2024; the extracted text does not separately identify each head of claim, but the case listing categories include working time. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.