Case 3311123/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C IRUNGU v NHS Professionals Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311123/2022
- Decision date
- 13 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C IRUNGU
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity, by letter dated 5 December 2023, to make representations or request a hearing on why strike out should not occur.
The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 19 September 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The tribunal recorded that the claimant either failed to make representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Claim type inferred from the supplied gov.uk listing category and Layer 1 hint; the judgment text itself refers only to 'the claim' and does not identify individual causes of action. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim type inferred from the supplied gov.uk listing category and Layer 1 hint; the judgment text itself refers only to 'the claim' and does not identify individual causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Claim type inferred from the supplied gov.uk listing category and Layer 1 hint; the judgment text itself refers only to 'the claim' and does not identify individual causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.