Case 3311134/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D. Petrie v Clicks Bar and Grill Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311134/2023
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill KC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D. Petrie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment in a redundancy payment claim brought by Mrs D. Petrie against Clicks Bar and Grill Ltd, heard by Employment Judge McNeill KC sitting alone at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 13 August 2025. The Claimant appeared in person; the Respondent did not appear. The Tribunal first amended the name of the Respondent to Clicks Bar and Grill Ltd.
The Tribunal held that the Claimant's claim for a redundancy payment was well-founded and ordered the Respondent to pay her £2,436.92. The judgment records that the Respondent's sole director, Ms Ashwell, had previously paid the Claimant £1,000 in about March/April 2023 in connection with the redundancy. The Tribunal directed that, if the Respondent pays the redundancy sum, the Claimant should give credit of £1,000 against that payment.
The Tribunal made no finding as to how the £1,000 prior payment should be accounted for if payment is instead made to the Claimant under the statutory Redundancy Payments Scheme. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will only be provided on request made within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claim for a redundancy payment well-founded and ordered the Respondent to pay £2,436.92. The judgment records that the Respondent's sole director had previously paid the Claimant £1,000 in about March/April 2023 in connection with the redundancy; if the Respondent pays the redundancy sum, the Claimant should give credit of £1,000 against it. No finding was made as to how the £1,000 should be accounted for if payment is instead made under the statutory Redundancy Payments Scheme. | Upheld | — | £2,437 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,437
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.