Case 3311169/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Robinson v Trinity Care Group Beds and Northants Ltd and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311169/2023
- Decision date
- 1 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Magee REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs S Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Mrs S Robinson, brought claims of unlawful deduction from wages against two respondents. The hearing took place at Norwich by CVP on 1 December 2025 before Employment Judge Magee, sitting alone. The Claimant appeared in person, the First Respondent was represented by Mr Melvin (a director), and the Second Respondent did not attend.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages against the First Respondent, Trinity Care Group Beds and Northants Ltd, was well founded and succeeded. The corresponding claim against the Second Respondent, Visiting Angels Care Ltd, was found not to be well founded and was dismissed. The First Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £2,300.31.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. As a result, the judgment text itself does not set out the detailed factual or legal reasoning behind the findings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim against the First Respondent (Trinity Care Group Beds and Northants Ltd) was well founded and succeeded; First Respondent ordered to pay the Claimant £2,300.31. | Upheld | — | £2,300 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim against the Second Respondent (Visiting Angels Care Ltd) was not well founded and was dismissed. Second Respondent did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.