Case 3311178/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D James v Menu Fresh Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311178/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D James
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It found that the respondent, Menu Fresh Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation), was in breach of contract and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £2,683.00 to the claimant.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,284.00. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Quill, dated 4 March 2024 and sent to the parties on 14 March 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages of £2,683.00 awarded for breach of contract under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £2,683 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy; entitled to redundancy payment of £2,284.00. | Upheld | — | £2,284 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,967
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.