Case 3311182/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Lidia Aniela Jozefczyk v 1.gxo Logistics Fst Limited and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 3311182/2024
- Decision date
- 15 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Lidia Aniela Jozefczyk
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hutchings struck out Lidia Aniela Jozefczyk's claim against the second respondent, GXO LOGISTICS HOLDINGS UK UNLIMITED, in a judgment approved on 15 July 2026. The judgment does not identify the claim's legal basis or record an outcome against the first respondent, GXO LOGISTICS FST LIMITED.
The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 10 March 2026 warning that it was considering striking out the claim against the second respondent. The letter gave her an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out. She did not reply, and the Tribunal struck out that claim for this reason. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the claim's legal basis. The strike-out applies only to the claim against the second respondent, GXO LOGISTICS HOLDINGS UK UNLIMITED. No outcome is recorded against the first respondent. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.