Case 3311192/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Rodda v The Creation Agency (uk) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311192/2023
- Decision date
- 5 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Rodda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Tynan on 5 June 2024 in the claim brought by Miss E Rodda against The Creation Agency (UK) Limited. The tribunal made findings on four heads of claim without a substantive contested hearing on the merits.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £703.86 gross. It further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, with damages of £3,128.21, and that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,931.90. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £341.93.
The judgment does not set out reasoning, legal tests, or findings of fact beyond the operative orders, consistent with a Rule 21 default judgment. No aggregate total or breakdown into basic/compensatory awards is given in the document.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. Unauthorised deductions from wages awarded as £703.86 gross. | Upheld | — | £704 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages of £3,128.21 awarded. | Upheld | — | £3,128 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed by reason of redundancy; statutory redundancy payment of £2,931.90 awarded. | Upheld | — | £2,932 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday entitlement unpaid; £341.93 awarded. Classified as holiday_pay rather than working_time as the judgment frames it as unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £342 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,106
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.