Case 3311201/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Bath v Little Garden Day Nurseries Limited, T/A ‘Family First Nurseries’ — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311201/2023
- Decision date
- 26 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Bath
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 10 May 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's directions dated 23 February 2024, had not actively pursued the case, and had no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no findings on the substantive merits of the underlying dispute and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separate the pleaded claims. It states that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment does not separate the pleaded claims. It states that 'the claim' was struck out after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.