Case 3311217/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Brewczak v Harrison Fabrication Lifting Limited Heard: by Cloud Video Platform (Bury St Edmunds) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311217/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Brewczak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr K Brewczak, brought proceedings against Harrison Fabrication Lifting Limited. On 14 April 2022, Employment Judge T Brown heard the matter by Cloud Video Platform. The claimant was not present or represented; the respondent was represented by Ms D Sherwin, solicitor.
The tribunal dismissed the claim on jurisdictional grounds. It found that the claim had been presented in breach of section 18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996 and therefore the Employment Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider it. No substantive findings were made on the underlying merits of the claim.
The written record states that reasons were given orally on 14 April 2022 and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was dismissed because it had been presented in breach of section 18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996, so the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.