Case 3311248/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Marlow v Riverside Rooms Catering Company Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311248/2023
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Marlow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the South-East Employment Tribunal on 28 September 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Postle decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Miss S Marlow was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,992.32. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,000.50. The judgment records no additional remedy components beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,992.32. | Upheld | — | £1,992 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,000.50. | Upheld | — | £2,001 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,993
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.