Case 3311298/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ian Baldwin v UK Truck and Plant Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311298/2023
- Decision date
- 7 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ian Baldwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case in person at Cambridge on 22 October 2024 and gave judgment orally. It found Mr Ian Baldwin's complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay well-founded and awarded him £11,666.67 in damages. The tribunal said that figure was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The tribunal also found that UK Truck and Plant Group Limited had breached contract by failing to make pension contributions on the claimant's behalf and ordered damages of £376.90. The written record does not identify any other issue or remedy, and the two damages figures together total £12,043.57.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in relation to notice pay. | Upheld | — | £11,667 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract for failure to make pension contributions on behalf of the claimant. | Upheld | — | £377 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,044
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.