Case 3311303/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T T H Truongova v Lala Drinks Barnet Ltd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311303/2023
- Decision date
- 17 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss T T H Truongova
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe first respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21. On the claimant's application, Lala Drinks HQ Limited was joined as second respondent and service was dispensed with.
The tribunal found that the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,640.75 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £210 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondents had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £168. The judgment records a total monetary award of £3,018.75.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,641 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £210 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £168 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,019
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.