Case 3311311/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A K Bhuller v Lala Drinks Barnet Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311311/2023
- Decision date
- 7 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A K Bhuller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 30 September 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Regional Employment Judge Foxwell determined that a judgment could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that LALA DRINKS BARNET LTD had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment records that the respondent must pay Miss A K Bhuller the sum of £2,441.25. No further reasoning, split remedy, or additional claims are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The judgment states the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and must pay the claimant £2,441.25; the wording in the text says 'net sum' and 'gross', which appears internally inconsistent, but the amount is clear. | Upheld | — | £2,441 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,441
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.