Case 3311343/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ampong v ABM Facility Services UK Ltd (sued as “ABM”) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311343/2023
- Decision date
- 3 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ampong
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 2 December 2024 before Employment Judge Quill sitting alone. The claimant, Mr D Ampong, did not appear or have representation. The respondent, ABM Facility Services UK Ltd, was represented by Mr J Hillerby, solicitor.
The judgment records that the entire claim was dismissed under Rule 47. No separate reasons, liability findings, or individual outcomes for particular heads of claim are set out in the written record provided.
The record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. The decision was sent to the parties on 3 January 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment states that the entire claim was dismissed under Rule 47. It does not set out separate findings for individual heads of claim in the text provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.