Case 3311377/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Lowe v South Cambridgeshire District Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311377/2023
- Decision date
- 9 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Members
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
- Panel members
- Mrs A Buck, Mr C Grant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Lowe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Bury St Edmunds before Employment Judge Graham with lay members Mrs A Buck and Mr C Grant. In its judgment, it found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure. As a result, the complaints of detriment and automatic unfair dismissal based on protected disclosure failed and were dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the separate complaint of unfair dismissal. No monetary award was made, and the judgment does not record any remedy findings or apportionment between claims. The decision was issued on 3 April 2025 and sent to the parties on 9 May 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure. The complaints of detriment and automatic unfair dismissal therefore failed and were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.