Case 3311379/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Martin, litigation consultant For the v Miss H Gardiner Counsel — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311379/2024
- Decision date
- 24 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Martin, litigation consultant For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Reading by CVP on 2 October 2025, before Tribunal Judge G D Davison sitting अके as a Judge of the Employment Tribunal, all claims against the respondents were struck out. The judgment records that the claims particularised in the Case Management Orders of 8 August 2025 were discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, victimisation, and constructive unfair dismissal.
The tribunal struck out those claims for lack of jurisdiction. It found that the claims had not been brought in time, could have been brought in time, did not form part of continuing acts, and that it would not be just and equitable to extend time. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made, and the written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claim for discrimination arising from disability was struck out for lack of jurisdiction. The tribunal said it had not been brought in time, could have been brought in time, did not form part of continuing acts, and it would not be just and equitable to extend time. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments was struck out for lack of jurisdiction on the same time-bar grounds set out in the judgment. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation claim was struck out for lack of jurisdiction because it was not brought in time, could have been brought in time, did not form part of continuing acts, and it would not be just and equitable to extend time. | Struck out | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The constructive unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of jurisdiction on the basis that it had not been brought in time and no extension of time was justified. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.