Case 3311382/2020 · Employment Tribunal
MR M ORAM v Delice de France Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311382/2020
- Decision date
- 5 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR M ORAM
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford on 13 and 14 October 2021 before Employment Judge Skehan sitting alone. The tribunal held that Mr Oram's claim for unfair dismissal contrary to the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well founded and dismissed it. It also dismissed the claimant's claims recorded in the judgment as pay in lieu of notice, holiday pay, and arrears of pay relating to first aid allowance payments.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The extract therefore records the disposals but does not set out separate written findings on each head of claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Recorded in the judgment as a claim for pay in lieu of notice; the written record does not assign a separate legal label. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay relating to first aid allowance payments. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.