Case 3311392/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages claim against Dave Whelan Realisations Ltd (formerly Dave…
An employment tribunal has upheld an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Dave Whelan Realisations Ltd (formerly Dave Whelan Sports Ltd) - 'In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation. The tribunal recorded a total award of £2,728.
- Case reference
- 3311392/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, issued under Rule 21, records that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The respondent is identified as Dave Whelan Realisations Ltd, formerly Dave Whelan Sports Ltd, in creditors voluntary liquidation, and the claimant is Miss S Callaghan. The tribunal therefore upheld the wages deduction claim.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,727.73. The provided judgment text does not set out any separate breakdown for the award, and no additional remedy such as interest is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,728 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,728
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.