Case 3311396/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311396/2020
- Decision date
- 9 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Richardson Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford on 9 and 10 June 2021 before Employment Judge A Richardson. The claimant, Mr R Dolan, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr W Griffiths, Counsel.
The tribunal's judgment was that the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. No other claims are recorded in the judgment.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the written record being sent. The extracted judgment text does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasoning or any remedy because the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.