Case 3311404/2020 · Employment Tribunal
no attendance For the v Mr M Yussuf, Director — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311404/2020
- Decision date
- 27 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
no attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the hearing on 14 May 2024 and did not provide an explanation to the Tribunal or the respondent. The Tribunal checked its correspondence inbox, telephoned the number on file twice, and allowed additional time for attendance before proceeding.
The Tribunal noted that the claimant had also failed to attend a previous hearing on 19 March 2024, had not contacted the Tribunal since April 2023, and had not provided updated contact details. It was satisfied that notice of the 14 May 2024 hearing had been properly served to the email and postal addresses held for the claimant, and dismissed the claim under rule 47.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the claim pursuant to rule 47 for the claimant's non-attendance and does not address the pleaded breach of contract claim on its merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim pursuant to rule 47 for the claimant's non-attendance and does not address the pleaded unlawful deduction from wages claim on its merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.