Case 3311450/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M M Charman v UK Car Service Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3311450/2024
- Decision date
- 13 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M M Charman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal consolidated case 3311450/2024 with case 6038355/2025 and heard them together at Reading on 14 and 15 January 2026 before Employment Judge George. In case 3311450/2024, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by the first respondent, UK Car Service Ltd, on 4 September 2024, and that her claims for a redundancy payment, breach of contract/notice pay, and unpaid holiday pay accrued but not taken on termination were well founded. The first respondent was ordered to pay unauthorised deductions from wages of £1,517.30, notice pay of £3,641.52, holiday pay of £670.40 (all gross of tax and NI), and a redundancy payment of £8,804.40.
The tribunal dismissed the claim of failure to comply with the duty to consult under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, finding it was not well founded. The tribunal also found that the claimant's employment did not transfer to the third respondent, Ladysafe and Sons Ltd, and dismissed the claims against the third respondent.
In case 6038355/2025, the tribunal dismissed the third respondent's claim against the first respondent. The tribunal found that while it had not been reasonably practicable for the third respondent to present the claim within three months after the alleged relevant transfer, the claim was not presented within a reasonable further period, so the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider it.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment of £8,804.40 ordered against the first respondent. | Upheld | — | £8,804 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay: 12 weeks x £303.46 = £3,641.52 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,642 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay accrued but not taken on termination: £670.40 gross. | Upheld | — | £670 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages 1 August 2024 – 4 September 2024: 5 weeks x £303.46 = £1,517.30 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,517 |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Claim of failure to comply with a duty to consult in respect of a relevant transfer under TUPE 2006 not well founded and dismissed. Tribunal also found the claimant's employment did not transfer to the third respondent; claims against the third respondent dismissed. The third respondent's separate claim (6038355/2025) against the first respondent was also dismissed for want of jurisdiction as it was not presented within a reasonable further period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,633
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.