Case 3311452/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Fisher v All Time Flowers Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3311452/2020
- Decision date
- 16 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Fisher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim, and the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had suffered unauthorised deductions from wages, was owed holiday pay, was owed notice pay, and was owed redundancy pay. Each of those claims succeeded.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, and that claim succeeded as well. No remedy sums were assessed in this judgment because the case was listed for a separate remedy hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone, with a time allocation of three hours on a date to be fixed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant suffered unauthorised deductions from wages and that this claim succeeds. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant is owed holiday pay and that this claim succeeds. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant is owed notice pay and that this claim succeeds. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant is owed redundancy pay and that this claim succeeds. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that this claim succeeds. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.