Case 3311456/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Kyle v Beaumont Health Care Ltd ( In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311456/2023
- Decision date
- 14 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Kyle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 14 June 2024, Employment Judge Bansal sat alone. The respondent, Beaumont Health Care Ltd (in voluntary liquidation), did not attend and was not represented, and Mrs K Kyle appeared in person.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay Mrs K Kyle a total of £29,316.82. The award was broken down as a redundancy award of £13,387.50, loss of earnings of £10,297.80, notice pay of £5,246.52, and unpaid pension contributions of £385.00.
The extracted text records the monetary award but does not set out separate liability reasoning for each head of loss. The figures indicate that the tribunal awarded the claim in full on the basis reflected in the listed heads of award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £13,388 |
| Unfair dismissal | Awarded as loss of earnings. | Upheld | — | £10,298 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £5,247 |
| Other | Awarded as unpaid pension contributions; the extracted text does not state a separate legal label for this head. | Upheld | — | £385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,317
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £10,298
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.