Case 3311470/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Dyer and ors v STA Travel Limited (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311470/2020
- Decision date
- 14 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Dyer and ors
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned claims for a protective award for failure to carry out collective consultation under the Trade & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, including case number 3311470/2020, listed in the attached schedule as Risk.
The Tribunal had sent an order to the parties on 14 December 2021 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the protective award claim should not be struck out. The stated reason was that the claim appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant appeared not to have been assigned to an establishment at which 20 or more employees were employed.
The claimants in the schedule did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, or did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the protective award claims in the scheduled case numbers.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim for a protective award for failure to carry out collective consultation under the Trade & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. Classified as other because the locked taxonomy has no protective award or collective consultation category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- Trade & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.