Case 3311473/2023 · Employment Tribunal

See Schedule v Henry Construction Projects Ltd (in administration) and 1 other — 2024

Case reference: 3311473/2023
Decision date: 5 December 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Dick Representation

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

See Schedule

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal recorded that the administrators had consented to the proceedings continuing on the terms set out in their letter of 3 November 2023. The respondents did not appear at the hearing.

The claimants' complaint under s 189(1)(a) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was found well founded. The Tribunal found that the first respondent dismissed as redundant 20 or more employees at one establishment within a period of ninety days without the required consultation.

A protective award was made under s 189(2) of the Act. The first respondent was ordered to pay the claimants remuneration for the protected period of 90 days beginning 8 June 2023.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Complaint under s 189(1)(a) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the first respondent did not comply with s 188 was found well founded. The judgment made a protective award of remuneration for a 90-day protected period but did not state a monetary amount.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.