Case 3311480/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Farah v Nova Marketing Systems Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311480/2020
- Decision date
- 5 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hill REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Farah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined by default judgment after Nova Marketing Systems Limited failed to enter a valid response, so a Rule 21 judgment was entered in favour of Mr M Farah. The hearing took place at Reading by CVP on 12 November 2021 before Employment Judge Hill, with Mr Farah appearing in person and the respondent not attending.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Farah the sum of £1,115. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment entered under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to enter a valid response. | Upheld | — | £1,115 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,115
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.