Case 3311529/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Wallwork (solicitor) For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311529/2020
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Wallwork (solicitor) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant complied with the terms of the unless order dated 11 January 2022, with the result that his discrimination claim proceeded. This judgment did not determine the substance of that discrimination claim; it recorded only the procedural position after compliance with the order.
At the same hearing, and for the reasons given in the oral judgment at the preliminary hearing, the respondent's application for strike out was dismissed. The written judgment does not set out those reasons.
The claimant's holiday pay claim and his detriment/dismissal complaint based on public interest disclosure were dismissed because they were withdrawn. No substantive liability findings or monetary award were recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as a claim for detriment/dismissal due to public interest disclosure. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.