Case 3311532/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Travis Malkan v Surya Hotels — 2023
- Case reference
- 3311532/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freshwater Representation
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Travis Malkan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in a claim brought by Travis Malkan against Surya Hotels Limited. The issue decided was whether the claimant was disabled for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal accepted that there was no medical evidence supporting a diagnosis of complex PTSD, although the claimant believed he had PTSD and the records referred to possible trauma-focused treatment. It found that he had been diagnosed with depression in March 2022 and that there had been earlier mental health concerns, including referrals to Wellbeing Services and consideration of CBT and EMDR.
The tribunal found that the claimant had a mental impairment from 29 September 2021, when he was signed off sick with stress. It held that the impairment adversely affected his day-to-day activities because he was unable to work, unable to sleep, and worried constantly. Applying the comparison required for substantial adverse effect, the tribunal concluded that the effect was substantial because the claimant had previously been able to work before his mental condition deteriorated.
The tribunal also found that the impairment was long-term. Although it considered that there was evidence the claimant had mental health issues before 29 September 2021, it did not find a substantial adverse effect in July or August 2021. On the evidence, including the referral pathway and the claimant's account of his mental health history, it concluded that the impairment was likely to last at least 12 months. The result was that the claimant was found to be a disabled person for Equality Act purposes.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal held that the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 because he had a mental impairment of depression with a substantial and long-term adverse effect from 29 September 2021. The judgment did not determine the substantive disability discrimination allegations or the arrears of pay claim. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- substantial adverse effect
- long-term condition
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.