Case 3311532/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Shyam Mistry v Axiom Ince Limited (In Administration) — 2026
- Case reference
- 3311532/2023
- Decision date
- 17 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Shyam Mistry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Shyam Mistry's claim against Axiom Ince Limited. The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action and records no determination of their merits.
The Tribunal had written to Mr Mistry on 6 February 2026, warning that it was considering strike-out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim appeared not to have been actively pursued. The letter invited him to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but he did not reply.
Employment Judge Manley was satisfied that the grounds for strike-out under Rule 38 applied and that strike-out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action; it strikes out the claim as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.