Case 3311577/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Laura Walsh, General Manager — 2022
- Case reference
- 3311577/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Watford by Cloud Video Platform on 16 February 2022 before Employment Judge French. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Laura Walsh, General Manager.
The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to furlough pay was found not well-founded and was dismissed. No separate monetary award is recorded in the written judgment.
The claim for holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerned furlough pay. The judgment states it was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states this claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.