Case 3311582/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Iwundu v Precious Homes Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3311582/2023
- Decision date
- 16 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Iwundu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 12 November 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr G Iwundu an opportunity to contact the Tribunal by 20 November 2024 to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons given were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order sent to the parties on 16 July 2024, made at a hearing on 9 May 2024, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Iwundu did not make any written representations and did not ask for a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. The hearing listed for 13 to 16 January 2025 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 12 November 2024 letter. The Tribunal referred to non-compliance with its order sent on 16 July 2024 and the claim not being actively pursued. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 12 November 2024 letter. The Tribunal referred to non-compliance with its order sent on 16 July 2024 and the claim not being actively pursued. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's 12 November 2024 letter. The Tribunal referred to non-compliance with its order sent on 16 July 2024 and the claim not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.