Case 3311598/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Craig-Moonie v The Oaksmere Hotel — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311598/2020
- Decision date
- 26 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KJ Palmer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Craig-Moonie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been filed by the Respondent, The Oaksmere Hotel. On that basis, Employment Judge KJ Palmer made a declaration that the Claimant, Mr T Craig-Moonie, had suffered an unlawful deduction of wages. The Tribunal awarded £3,333.00 in respect of that claim.
The Tribunal also awarded the Claimant £1,030.13 for unpaid holiday pay. The extracted judgment does not set out separate findings beyond the awards themselves, and it does not record any disputed evidence or reasoning because the Respondent had not filed a response.
The total payable by the Respondent was £4,363.13. The judgment was dated 12 January 2021 and entered in the register on 26 January 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | In a Rule 21 judgment, with no response filed by the Respondent, the Tribunal declared that the Claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction of wages and awarded £3,333.00. | Upheld | — | £3,333 |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal also awarded unpaid holiday pay of £1,030.13. The judgment does not separate the legal basis further in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £1,030 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,363
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.