Case 3311601/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Defta v Razer Inc — 2021
- Case reference
- 3311601/2020
- Decision date
- 7 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Defta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response to the claim, so judgment was entered under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal recorded a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and found that the Claimant was owed wages.
The tribunal awarded the Claimant £6,400 in compensation and ordered the Respondent to pay that sum. No separate breakdown of the award was given in the judgment, and no other claims or remedies were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the Respondent did not present a response. The tribunal found the Claimant was owed wages and awarded £6,400 in compensation. | Upheld | — | £6,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,400
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.